| |
1. Introduction (p. 1) |
| |
|
1.1 Sexual Violence and Partner Abuse in Holiday (p. 2) |
| |
|
1.2 Aims and Research Questions (p. 4) |
| |
|
1.3 Literature Review (p. 5) |
| |
|
|
1.3.1 Holiday as Provocative Art Cinema 5 (p. 5) |
| |
|
|
1.3.2 Cultural Discussions in Circulation (p. 9) |
| |
2. Theoretical Framework:#MeToo as an Agenda-Setter (p. 13) |
| |
|
2.1 #MeToo and Representations Sexual Violence (p. 13) |
| |
|
2.2 Trauma Theory and Trigger Warnings (p. 18) |
| |
|
2.2 Trauma Theory and Trigger Warnings (p. 20) |
| |
3. Methodology and Source Material (p. 24) |
| |
|
3.1 Why Holiday? (p. 24) |
| |
|
3.2 A Netnographic Case-Study (p. 25) |
| |
|
3.3 Data Collection on Letterboxd (p. 26) |
| |
|
3.4 Limitations and Considerations (p. 29) |
| |
4. Is “That Scene” Really Necessary?: Discussions About Harmful Portrayals of Sexual Assault (p. 31) |
| |
|
4.1 Outlining the Public Discourse on Rape Depictions (p. 31) |
| |
|
4.2 Letterboxd Reactions: Authenticity, Censorship and the Female Perspective (p. 35) |
| |
5. Genre Expectations: Promotional Materials and Comparisons with Revenge (p. 43) |
| |
|
5.1 Revenge: #MeToo’s First Horror Film (p. 43) |
| |
|
5.2 ”the poster > the film” (p. 46) |
| |
6. Addressing Concerns About Eroticism: Holiday’s Circulation on Porn Sites (p. 55) |
| |
|
6.1 Interrogating the “Unerotic” Gaze (p. 55) |
| |
|
6.2 Exploring the Relationship Between Holiday and Pornography (p. 59) |
| |
7. Discussion (p. 67) |
| |
8. Conclusion (p. 72) |
| |
Filmography (p. 75) |
| |
|
Films (p. 75) |
| |
|
Television (p. 75) |
| |
Bibliography (p. 76) |
| |
|
Scholarly works (p. 76) |
| |
|
Popular sources (p. 78) |
| |
|
Letterboxd reviews (p. 80) |
| |
|
Videos (p. 83) |